When I met
and drew Vine Deloria, Jr., I had already read his book entitled We Talk, You Listen: New Tribes, New Turf.
His topic and his style had caught my attention. His introduction begins,
“Every now and then I am impressed with the thinking of the non-Indian. I was
in Cleveland last year and got to talking with a non-Indian about American
history. He said that he was really sorry about what had happened to Indians,
but that there was good reason for it. The continent had to be developed and he
felt that Indians had stood in the way and thus had had to be removed. ‘After
all,’ he remarked, ‘what did you do with the land when you had it?’ I didn’t
understand him until later when I discovered that the Cuyahoga River running
through Cleveland is inflammable. So many combustible pollutants are dumped
into the river that the inhabitants have to take special precautions during the
summer to avoid accidentally setting it on fire. After reviewing the argument
of my non-Indian friend I decided that he was probably correct. Whites had made
better use of the land. How many Indians could have thought of creating an
inflammable river?”
I had
studied the many assertions in his book, including the need to cross the
boundaries dividing fields of expertise so that issues can be seen clearly in
all their dimensions, the way the country has often relied on a “war economy”
so as to forestall “wholesale collapse of the social structure,” the fact that
people have not yet understood “how groups relate to each other,” how membership
in a tribe is similar to membership in a cooperative, ways of harnessing the
tension between wisdom and new ideas, and what sovereignty really means and why
it is so important. I knew that Deloria was a Hunkpapa Sioux with a law degree
and that he championed the liberty of permitting Indians to pursue their own
lifestyles and to interpret their own identities without cultural intervention.
With all my
study, you would have thought I would have been smarter. I felt I was so in
tune with Deloria’s book in particular and with Indians in general that I was
not really an heir to the Indians’ enemies. Also, Deloria’s tone was so often
imbued with sardonic humor that I thought he might say, “Alright. Enough is
enough. Now that I’ve insulted you—which you royally deserved—let’s slap each
other on the back and say what a good joke it was.”
Deloria
stood at a podium before a large audience. I sat in the row directly in front
of him, and I began to sketch his portrait. Meanwhile, I was listening to his
speech. He said that non-Indians ruled through—and were ruled by—expensive
technologies, one-sided commerce, and unfair control by banks and government
offices. He talked at length about “otherness,” both real and imagined. The
longer he spoke, the more uncomfortable I became.
I began to
realize that, when he looked at me, he saw a non-Indian. I began to sense that
he was not welcoming of what non-Indians had done and that he was under no obligation to be welcoming toward me. It began to dawn on me that he meant what he said.
My Portrait of Vine Deloria |
As the
themes of his presentation deepened, I found my portrait changing. My lines
became harder and blacker. I added more and more lines. Usually when creating a
portrait of a well-known figure, I tried to improve on the facial features,
but, with Deloria, I became aware that I was drawing him exactly as he was:
glasses slightly bent, hair unruly, collar askew, eyes seeing me as the
non-Indian I am. It dawned on me that I was seeing him—Well, what do you
know?—as the Indian he was.
There was
to be no back slapping, no fraternity laugh, no college camaraderie. Deloria’s
speech was an Indian speech. It was not another artificial lecture on a
university campus. It was a significant, timely address with a real point of view
and an important purpose.
The Deloria
talk was the first time that I understood—on a gut level—cultural differences
and just how patronizing I had been.
Only now,
many years later, am I beginning to catch up with Deloria’s mind. Back when I
drew him, he was light years beyond me. My portrait of him remains one of my
favorites because I put on paper the man I saw before me, not the person I
wanted him to be.